Th
e Law Offices of David M. Pruessner











Three Galleria Tower
13155 Noel Road
Suite 1025
Dallas, TX 75240
(972) 991-6700
(972) 991-6710 FAX



Insurance Coverage


Coverage Opinions and Coverage Litigation

For more than a decade David Pruessner has worked in the field of insurance coverage, including issuing opinion letters and handling insurance coverage litigation.  His clients have included Cigna, Amerisure, Hartford, and other insurers.  To a lesser extent, he has represented various insureds (including Benihana’s Restaurants and Family Dollar Stores) in their disputes with insurance companies regarding the scope of insurance coverage.  On a case-by-case basis he has assisted counsel for claimants with respect to whether their claims will ultimately be covered by a defendant’s liability insurance.

David has authored numerous articles in the field of insurance coverage, including articles published by International Risk Management Institute, a major publisher of insurance treatises.  His articles include Mold Claims: Fact, Fiction, and Coverage, THE RISK REPORT (International Risk Management Institute) Vol. XXIV, No. 8 (2002) and Sharing The Blame: When Can A Defendant Force Others To Share Liability?  THE RISK REPORT (International Risk Management Institute) Vol.XXII, No. 3 (1999).  He is a Senior Technical Adviser for IRMI’s treatise Personal Risk Management and Insurance.  He is approved by the Texas Department of Insurance to teach continuing education courses for insurance professionals.  These courses include presentations on Reinsurance, Claims Handling, Uninsured Motorist Coverage, and “Sex, Violence, and Insurance Coverage,” which addresses liability insurance coverage for employers sued after their employees have engaged in acts of sexual harassment or violence.

His work on insurance disputes has covered a wide variety of topics, including the following:

Representation before the Texas Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in the major case on whether Texas public policy precludes liability insurance from covering punitive damages: Fairfield Insurance v. Stephens Martin Paving, 246 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. 2007). See Texas Lawyer Article.
Fox Electric I, Ltd. v. Amerisure Insurance Company, 252 Fed. Appx. 579 (5th Cir. 2007) (liability insurance and construction defects).
Michigan Mutual Ins. Co. v. Alliance Const., Inc., 2005 W.L. 2297505 (S.D. Tex. 2005) (liability insurance and construction defects).
Representation of Benihana’s (a major restaurant corporation) with respect to a dispute over a “By-Law Endorsement” (often referred to as “code upgrade endorsement”) as it applied to rebuilding a restaurant after a fire.
Representation of an insurer in a coverage dispute regarding a series of CGL policies with respect to a $15 million judgment for against a mortuary school.  This case produced a written opinion from a bankruptcy court that ultimately adjudicated coverage issues as the central aspect of the bankruptcy.  See In re Pierce Mortuary Colleges, Inc., 212 B.R. 549 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Tex.1997).

Representation of insurers with respect to fraudulent statements made in applications for insurance coverage and rescission of policies.
Representation of a major Swiss insurer in a coverage dispute with a policyholder under a manuscript casualty policy for lost profits incurred at several factories as a result of floods.
Representation of insurers in multiple disputes involving Additional Insured Endorsements to CGL policies.
Representation of insurers with respect to bus accidents involving multiple fatalities and coverage disputes over whether liability policies purchased by various entities cover the liabilities of the drivers of the buses.
Representation of an insurer in coverage litigation with the Reverend Barry Bailey regarding homeowners’ insurance coverage (under Personal Injury “invasion of privacy” coverage) for claims brought by women parishioners who alleged sexual harassment by the Reverend Bailey.
Representation of insurers in litigation between various insurance companies regarding the duties owed by “excess” insurance carriers in liability suits.
Representation of a workers’ compensation insurer regarding its relationship with five other insurers (different policy years) for toxic exposure injuries and deaths which spanned a fifteen year period.
Representation of an insurer in a declaratory judgment action on choice-of-law issues regarding the interpretation of a Texas homeowners’ policy where the damages occurred in an accidental shooting in another state.
Representation of the Association of Fire & Casualty Companies in Texas in filing Amicus Curiae briefs before the Texas Supreme Court.
Issuing numerous insurance coverage opinions on many aspects of liability insurance policies, including questions regarding CGL Policies, Completed Operations, Construction Defects, Umbrella Policies, Vendors’ Endorsements, Economic Damages (as distinguished from property damage), Employment Practices Exclusions, Policy Periods (“first distinct manifestation” issues), Commercial Auto Policies, Bobtail Insurance, Trucker’s Endorsements, Mandatory Endorsements, Separation Of Insureds provisions (regarding claims for negligently failing to prevent intentional acts by other insureds), and questions on whether policies provide primary or excess coverage.